Who difficult given the first class?

Who difficult given the first class? In previous article we looked at what are the difficulties of teaching for first graders. But why do some children successfully master the school of wisdom, and the other part - with a scratch? Why in the first grade child is lagging behind?

In fact, the term "dunce" is ambiguous. Experts identify underachievement, so to speak, the global (where the child with depressing stability "does not pull" the two main subjects - and math, and the Russian language, that is, reading the letter) and specific (academic failure, only in specific subjects: for example, a child reads well, but Here mathematics he was not given at all - or vice versa).

Explains these two different kinds of gaps in their studies (global and situational), of course, for various reasons, but chief among them - flaws in the development of cognitive sphere and low motivation of the child.

Psychologists usually distinguish Three groups of underachieving first formers :

- Babes with low intensity training activities;
- Babes with low efficiency of training activities;
- Babes with a combination of these problems in varying combinations.

Children who belong to the first group is called, "Do not find themselves" in their studies . As soon as it turns out that learning is not so easy, a child loses interest in learning and working "halves", because its main motive is not knowledge, and desire for recognition, praise and/or leadership. And if you can not be the first in school, the child chooses the easiest path for itself: it reduces the intensity of training to a minimum (so that "not flew) and concentrates its strength instead on something else.

Well, if this "other" would be socially acceptable extra-curricular activities: sports, applied arts, etc. Often, however, the situation is worse: the child tries to win the leadership in the classroom "crook", attracting attention, as best he can - and often asocial ways.

In short, these children go to school to learn, and communicate and to assert itself. Since everyone is looking for what he most lacks, it can be concluded that the problem lies precisely in the lack of acceptance of others and the child itself, the lack of it in its 7 years of quiet confidence that he is - good, loved and successful .

The children of the second type, as they say, 11,111,116. would be glad to, but can not [/b] . Their difficulties stem from the fact that they just do not have the vocabulary, communication skills and knowledge about the world, the general intellectual development. This is due to a low cultural level of parents, who were unable to provide all of this, or mikroporazheniyami cerebral cortex of a child (or both, and others together).
A separate subgroup can be identified леворуких детей (их около 10% – то есть в каждом классе как минимум один найдется). Такие детки have certain peculiarities of thinking, they write in a different manner and do not even think like "normal" children. Fortunately, today there are practically no teachers, seeking to "reeducate" those kids (because the issue about the dangers of such a "re-education" has long been investigated and repeatedly voiced): But this is not a vice, not a whim or obstinacy, it is - a feature of child. However, the secondary school curriculum continues to focus on children of "traditional", so many 11,111,114. the problem of left-handers [/url] remain relevant: they have difficulty writing, and this is their problem concerns "specific" (ie - one-sided) stagnated.

Children of the third group of the most problematic in terms of predicting the development of situation: are not psychologically ready for school, . In other words, these kids can not and do not want to learn, they do not understand why it is generally necessary, and what pleasure can be obtained from the "obtaining" of new knowledge: the knowledge they are completely passive.

The question "Who is to blame" I deliberately did not put in this article, because the answer is clear: those who raise a child like this - unsure of their powers, incurious, intellectually lazy, spiritless. But is not the case: the parents, of course, do not expect the criticism, and support and advice - what to do about it now.